Why “Throwing in the Kitchen Sink” Can Sink Your Employment Tribunal Claim

When Claimants start an Employment Tribunal claim, many believe that more is more—that listing every possible allegation will increase their chances of success. In reality, this approach often backfires. Here’s why:

1. More Allegations = Longer Hearings

Every allegation needs evidence. The more allegations you include, the more documents, witnesses, and arguments you’ll need. Longer hearings mean higher costs and fewer options for free or affordable representation. Many Claimants end up going it alone at the final hearing because they simply can’t afford the extended process.

2. Longer Hearings = Longer Waits

Tribunals schedule cases based on hearing length. A one-day case might be listed within 6–9 months. But multi-day cases? London South ET (including Ashford ET) is currently listing five-day hearings into 2029! That’s a long time to wait for justice.

3. More Allegations ≠ More Chance of Winning

Throwing mud at the wall rarely works. In fact, it can weaken your case. If you include lots of minor claims without strong evidence, they can overshadow your strongest points. Employers know this and will exploit it to distract from their wrongdoing.

4. Judges Are Human

Employment Judges and panel members have limits. Overloading them with peripheral points risks losing their attention. If they can’t follow your case, they can’t rule in your favour.

The Smarter Approach

Focus on the nub of your case—the strongest, most provable points. A clear, concise claim means:

• The panel can follow your arguments.

• Your hearing will be shorter (and sooner).

• You’re more likely to find affordable help.

Justice isn’t about quantity—it’s about clarity.